SUBSCRIBE E-NEWSLETTERS AWARDS COLUMNS MULTIMEDIA CONFERENCES ABOUT US RESEARCH
The 'Grand Experiments'

Are corporate exchanges the answer to soaring healthcare costs?

Sunday, September 2, 2012
Write To The Editor Reprints

Early in 2009, 7,000 retirees at Eastman Chemical stepped into what may represent the future of health benefits. Since then, they've had the opportunity to choose from more than 300 different healthcare plans offered by more than 25 insurance carriers on Extend Health, a private healthcare exchange.

Eastman Chemical previously offered retirees a PPO from a single carrier, says Phil Belcher, health and welfare plans manager at the Kingsport, Tenn.-based company, which has 13,500 employees worldwide.

"Moving [the retirees] to an exchange model offered them the opportunity to purchase many different plans," he says. "It allows Medicare retirees to individualize their coverage."

Although private healthcare-insurance exchanges have been around for more than a decade, serving mostly small businesses, a growing number have started popping up that are targeted to mid- to large-sized companies. Employees shop for health plans at these insurance marketplaces, which offer multiple plans from either a single carrier -- or ideally, multiple carriers -- and are designed to encourage competition. But private exchanges don't have long track records, and are referred to as "grand experiments" by some HR consultants. While exchanges are off to a good start in offering employee choice and helping HR predict annual healthcare costs, their real value is yet to be discovered.

Now that the Supreme Court has upheld the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the concept of healthcare exchanges is gaining ground. The law contains a provision for the creation of public-healthcare exchanges in 2014, aimed at small employers and individuals without insurance. Private or corporate exchanges, which utilize the same concept, will become commonplace in the near future, say healthcare experts, because they're a realistic alternative to a healthcare-delivery model that can't be sustained.

Still, nothing is perfect. Switching to a private exchange can provoke fear among some employees, who may be confused, resistant to change or even intimidated by the new system.

Predicting Costs 

"We were not sure what to expect," says Belcher. "We were very cautious in the beginning."

Over a six-month period, he says, HR partnered with Extend Health to develop educational materials, invited employees to a local information workshop, and encouraged them to visit Extend Health's website or call its benefit advisers with questions or concerns. Before the exchange, he says, retirees accounted for half of the company's employee-service-center transactions. After the transition, that number dropped to less than 5 percent.

While the exchange helped Eastman reduce its administrative workload and realize savings, Belcher says, predictability may be the biggest benefit. "We have totally capped our costs, so we know, on an annual basis, what we're going to spend in providing retiree benefits to that population," he says. "That's a huge advantage."

So is the possibility of using exchanges for pre-Medicare retirees, who are typically heavy consumers of healthcare. Many of the retirees with pre-existing conditions were never guaranteed insurance coverage under the old law. But that's no longer the case under PPACA.

Still, the company has no plans to use an exchange for its active 11,000 U.S. employees, says Edna Kinner, Eastman's vice president of HR for North America.

HR will adopt a wait-and-see approach over the next several years to allow corporate exchanges to evolve and fix whatever may be broken, she says, adding that exchanges are not yet able to complement and reinforce Eastman's overall healthcare strategy. For the company to make the switch, says Kinner, exchanges would need to do more than just serve as cost-management mechanisms: They would need to offer a wide variety of wellness and preventive services, as well. 

"At this point in time, we do have a focus on prevention and actively managing disease and reducing health risks associated with our [employees] and their families," she says. "Will the exchanges be able to host [our] integrated objectives that become critical to business success, versus just cost management?"

Both are integral to the overall outcome that HR needs to achieve from an employee productivity standpoint, says Kinner. If exchanges can't offer all the pieces of an integrated health strategy, she says, companies could end up paying the price by actually reducing their health outcomes rather than improving them.

"If you pull out a piece and you lose some of that critical long-term investment in the employee, you could actually sub-optimize the health outcomes of the population you're dealing with when [you're] just trying to get a new system that's cheaper or less costly to deliver," she says.

Other companies have chosen not to wait. At Bemidji, Minn.-based North Country Business Products, 200 employees have been using My Plan by Medica, which offers 20 different plans under one carrier and is powered by Bloom Health's defined-contribution private-exchange platform. The employees have been enrolled since January and, so far, no complaints, says Dean Crotty, president of the employee-owned company, which installs and supports point-of-sale systems in 22 states. 

Crotty asked a small group of employees in different areas to evaluate the exchange. While members believed it was "an awesome way to go," he says, some employees were intimidated by the exchange when it was first introduced.

"Having options was the biggest, most confusing factor, because now they had to determine [which plan to buy] for themselves," says Crotty. "They had to do some background work on what their medical needs have been, research it and their individual [or family's] needs, then try to find a plan that would work for them."

HR developed an online presentation to help educate employees about how the exchange worked and explain its benefits. Every employee now receives a fixed dollar amount each month for insurance premiums, while those who select a health savings account receive an additional company contribution each month for their HSA. The company encourages HSAs because they're a long-term safety net since funds grow tax-free over time and can be withdrawn years later for healthcare expenses.

Employees who previously couldn't participate in the company's health plan have now found plans they can afford, he adds. Buying their own health insurance has also increased employees' awareness of insurance costs and enhanced their appreciation of health insurance as an employee benefit.

HR couldn't be happier.

"From a cost standpoint, we know exactly what healthcare is going to cost us now on an annual basis; before, we didn't," Crotty says, adding that the company was facing a 12-percent increase in healthcare premiums. " Today, we know exactly what that dollar amount is going to be."

Unknown Territory

Although exchanges may be the panacea for rising insurance premiums and medical expenses, HR may need to take another look, says Pat Haraden, principal at Longfellow Benefits, a brokerage and consulting firm in Boston.

"Once you make the commitment to do the exchange and downsize, it's very hard to go back," he says. "If the exchange concept fails, becomes too cumbersome, or the exchange is bought by an insurance company that only offers its own products and you don't like them, you'll have a very hard time going back to the traditional way of buying benefits on your own."

Employees could also blame HR if something goes wrong -- if, for example, the plan they selected won't cover a needed medical procedure, Haraden says. Then there's loss of control. Imagine participating in an exchange with multiple carriers that's later bought out. Now the exchange supports one carrier with various plans. Besides limiting employee choice, the carrier could raise premiums across all plans.

The latter scenario could happen today, he says, since some exchanges only offer one carrier.

"One of the things that is critical to a successful exchange is competition," adds Ken Sperling, national health-exchange strategy leader at Aon Hewitt in Norwalk, Conn. "There has to be viable competition in order for prices to go down and for efficiency to come through in this delivery system."

Several years ago, Aon Hewitt introduced Navigators, an exchange for Medicare-eligible individuals. More than 100,000 retirees belong, and can choose from plans offered by more than 80 carriers. Likewise, its Corporate Exchange, which features six carriers, will be launched in January for active employees and pre-65 retirees.

Newsletter Sign-Up:

Benefits
HR Technology
Talent Management
HR Leadership
Inside HR Tech
HRENow
Special Offers

Email Address



Privacy Policy

The biggest disadvantage of an exchange is that it's a relatively unproven concept, says Sperling. "There's lots of precedent to demonstrate that the concept should work, but we don't have 20 years of experience running a private exchange in the United States healthcare system to prove that it will actually work," he says.

Although employers are currently experiencing modest claims increases, he says, now is the time to lock in a fully insured exchange rate, not "after the barn has started burning" or when claims explode. While moving to an exchange does require a leap of faith, he says, HR has as much transparency now into what exchange rates will be as it does predicting the amount of its self-insured claims in 2014.

Exchanges will probably follow the traditional product development curve, says Sperling, in which a few companies try them, followed by a wave of "fast followers" and then, ultimately, a fair percentage of employers. "We''ll go from an idea to a mainstream strategy in a fairly short period of time, maybe three to five years."

Growth and Opportunity

Back in 1999, HealthPass New York began operating as a private health-insurance exchange for small businesses in New York state. Today, its 4,000 members choose from between 16 and 22 plans offered by three carriers, says Vince Ashton, the company's CEO.

Many exchanges present employers with opportunities to improve their workforce's health and quality of healthcare, he says. Their plans offer benefits such as wellness, which some employers could not previously afford.

"Getting the CFO to sign [off] on something that's going to be more expensive in the beginning, but yields benefits down the road, is sometimes difficult," says Ashton. "[Exchanges] might be an easier way for HR to make that happen and reap some of the benefits without having to have such a large expenditure for the setup. It's all about the long view and how this is going to play into your ability to manage your benefits long-term -- and the costs associated with it."

All exchanges, however, must throw employees a life preserver, by offering multiple tools and resources, says John Naylor, general manager for commercial sales and account management at Minneapolis-based Medica.

Employees need multiple tools and resources -- not just a website -- in order to make informed decisions. These resources include bilingual advisers, a phone bank and decision-support tools to help them narrow down their choices in a systematic way.

Overall, exchanges have wide appeal, especially for American corporations with overseas competitors, adds Bryce Williams, managing director of exchange solutions at Towers Watson in San Mateo, Calif. He believes many will migrate a substantial part of their workforce over to exchanges.

Since employees at foreign companies may receive subsidized healthcare benefits from their government, he says, U.S.-based multinationals will be among the early adopters of exchanges to compete more effectively, taking advantage of their power of individual choice and ability to predict healthcare costs. This may be especially true within the retail and hospitality industries, which employ many low-wage workers.

"They are absolutely going to look at exchange opportunities to take care of those people," Williams says, adding that employers using exchanges have realized savings of up to 25 percent of their healthcare costs. "Exchanges can [frequently] provide a better benefit value for the dollar than they currently offer through their group plan."

Williams should know. As founder and former CEO of Extend Health, which was acquired by Towers Watson in May, he says the exchange now supports more than 275 mid- to large-sized employers and Medicare retirees nationwide. Recently, the exchange built electronic interfaces to 80 of America's largest insurance carriers that offer approximately

3,000 plan choices to exchange members.

Because they offer choice, he says, exchanges will also boost health-plan satisfaction scores among employees. For the first time, he says, Americans can do what they do every day as consumers -- shop and compare.

Exchanges may indeed live a long, healthy life, he says, partly due to the Supreme Court's PPACA decision.

"It was imperative that the ruling happen," Williams says, explaining that the decision will help fuel the growth of exchanges. "Now you will see them proliferate."

Copyright 2014© LRP Publications