News, Strategies and Resources for Senior HR Executives  
 
Search
powered by Workindex®
Advanced Search | Browse the Directory
Web Exclusive Content
Home
HR News Analysis
Features
Columnists
People
Resources and Tools
Technology Center
Legal Clinic
HRE Conferences
HRE Rankings
Webinars
RSS
Career Center
HR Internet Search
powered by workindex
HRE Information
Subscription Center
Advertiser Information
About Us
Contact Us
 

Newsletter Sign-up

Click on the name of the free newsletter below to preview:

HREOnlineTM Update
HRE News & Analysis
Bill Kutik's HR Technology Column
Carol Harnett's Benefits Column
Peter Cappelli's Talent Management Column
Special Offers
People on the Move
Susan Meisinger's HR Leadership Column
HTML Text
E-Mail Address:


Click here to unsubscribe
Privacy Policy

 

Print Email Write to the Editor Reprints

Project Oxygen

The research project helped Google identify practices and procedures that set apart good and not-so-good managers.

This article accompanies Powered from Within.


By Andrew R. McIlvaine

Project Oxygen is among the projects being tackled by the Google Inc. HR department's PiLab team, a team made up of 25 scientists and researchers who focus on HR-related research designed to help the company continue to improve and innovate.

Project Oxygen is designed to measure the impact of good managers and help the company make more of them, says Director of People Analytics and Compensation Prasad Setty, one of the 2010 HR's Rising Stars.

The project got its name, says Setty, because "good managers are the lifeblood of Google, helping it grow and innovate."

"Project Oxygen is our attempt to verify here at Google the age-old HR statement that people leave organizations because of their managers," he says. "We wanted to see whether there's a huge variance in the quality of managers and if so, what kind of impact was it having on the company?"

Setty and his team examined the results from Googlegeist, the company's annual employee survey, as well as performance-management scores and other data on managers to identify good performers and poor ones.

Based on the data, the company's managers were grouped into four quadrants based on their quality.

Next, teams of researchers interviewed high-scoring and low-scoring managers to determine the practices and behaviors that separated the good ones from the not-so-good ones. It was a double-blind study: Neither the interviewers or the interviewees were told which quadrant the managers fell into, says Setty.

"We wanted to find out how frequently the managers met with their teams, how often they provided feedback to their direct reports," he says.

After conducting the interviews, Setty and his team were able to isolate the behaviors that separated the good managers from the bad, and were able to identify five negative behaviors that all managers should refrain from, he says.

Although he declined to go into specifics about what those five behaviors were, Setty says this information -- along with the behaviors and practices employed by the highest-ranked managers -- has since been incorporated into Google's manager-training program.

"We wanted to have research-driven management practices, and Project Oxygen helped us do that," says Setty.

See also:
Powered from Within

Fun Facts

HR Leadership-Development Study

* Editor's Note: According to Google: "We found that great managers shared eight common behaviors that help their teams perform at their peak and five pitfalls for managers to avoid."


July 1, 2010

Copyright 2010© LRP Publications